Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications 

CivilComp Proceedings
ISSN 17593433 CCP: 83
PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY Edited by: B.H.V. Topping, G. Montero and R. Montenegro
Paper 148
The Development of a Novel NonLinear Spectral Model for Analysing Offshore Structures, Part II: Development of Response Spectra and Model Application M. Hartnett
Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland M. Hartnett, "The Development of a Novel NonLinear Spectral Model for Analysing Offshore Structures, Part II: Development of Response Spectra and Model Application", in B.H.V. Topping, G. Montero, R. Montenegro, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology", CivilComp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 148, 2006. doi:10.4203/ccp.83.148
Keywords: nonlinear spectra, convolution, Hermite polynomials, offshore structures.
Summary
The accompanying Part I paper discusses the need for nonlinear spectral analysis
of certain offshore structures. In that paper possible approaches to this problem
were discussed and the perturbation method selected for this research. Details of the
finite element model developed were presented and how the drag force term of
Morison's was manipulated to provide a constant term and a time varying term. It
was shown how system receptances were derived for use in computing the spectral
responses.
In this paper details of how the response spectra were derived are presented. In this derivation use is made of the convolution integral which leads to higher order response terms. The new model is then applied to a two dimensional structure subjected to random gravity wave forces as defined by a Pierson Moskowitz spectrum. The same structure and waves loading is modelled using a linear structural model; the results from both models are compared. From the comparisons of the results of both models it is clear that in certain situations it is necessary to use nonlinear spectral analysis. The force term on the right hand side of the equations of motion contains drag force terms that are nonlinear with respect to water particle velocities. These nonlinear functions are expressed as a series of Hermite polynomials that possess useful orthogonality properties. It has been shown that Hermite polynomials converge rapidly to the exact solution and that the approach can easily be extended to the situation when steady currents prevail. The nonlinear spectral model developed above was applied to perform analyses on a cantilever and plane frame structures subjected to wave loadings. The results from these analyses were compared with the results from applications of a linear model to the same structures; details of these analyses and comparisons are presented in this paper. Because the linear spectral model has previously been well validated by the author the comparisons made between the linear and nonlinear models in this chapter provide good validation for the nonlinear model. The main objective in developing the nonlinear model is to determine whether or not structure spatial extent has a significant effect on the nonlinear structure response during a random storm as suggested by Moe [1]. In order to achieve this objective, a nonlinear model of a cantilever was developed and results compared with results from a linear analysis; in this analysis there are no spatial effects and it will serve as an initial check on the results of the nonlinear model. Both linear and nonlinear models are then applied to a simple offshore portal frame to consider spatial effects; more complex structures would take much more time to analyse and not provide any better insight into the processes. The nonlinear spectral response model developed in this and the accompanying paper and applied in the paper is an extension of research carried out by others in that it incorporates leg spacing phase effects. The model was firstly applied to a cantilever and results obtained showed that the linear and nonlinear models predicted similar responses. The nonlinear model was then also applied to portal frames for different storm intensities. The results of this analysis show that there is an appreciable difference between the results of the linear and nonlinear models. In particular, it is shown that response spectra computed using the nonlinear model may be larger than corresponding spectra computed using the linear model. This difference is due to interactions between the higher order force terms and the phase effects caused by the leg spacings of the portal frame. The author is not aware of this phenomenon being observed by previous researchers and it is an important conclusion of this work. From their research EatockTaylor and Rajagopalan [2] concluded that 'The influence of the nonlinearities has been demonstrated to be smaller at lower seastates'. For the structures considered, the current research shows that when leg spacing is included in the analysis then the discrepancies between the linear and nonlinear response spectra can be significant at lower seastates. This is an important conclusion because lower seastates have a higher frequency of occurrence and thus the fatigue life of structural members may be affected. Other researchers have concluded that the difference between the linear and nonlinear response spectra is negligible around the frequencies of maximum wave energy, but significant at resonance. Significantly, this is not the situation when analysing portal frames; in this situation the main difference occurs close to the frequencies of maximum wave energy due to the higher order effects interacting with the leg spacing phase effects. Thus, not only is it important to avoid resonance problems but the structural spatial extent may also be an important consideration in the design process because of nonlinearities arising from drag force terms. References
purchase the fulltext of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper 
