Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications 

CivilComp Proceedings
ISSN 17593433 CCP: 86
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING COMPUTING Edited by: B.H.V. Topping
Paper 177
Numerical Analysis of the Inelastic Buckling Length of NonSway Reinforced Concrete Columns A. Bendito^{1}, M.L. Romero^{2}, J.L. Bonet^{2}, P.F. Miguel^{2} and M.A. Fernandez^{2}
^{1}Engineering Department, Núcleo Universitario Rafael Rangel, University of Los Andes, Venezuela
A. Bendito, M.L. Romero, J.L. Bonet, P.F. Miguel, M.A. Fernandez, "Numerical Analysis of the Inelastic Buckling Length of NonSway Reinforced Concrete Columns", in B.H.V. Topping, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing", CivilComp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 177, 2007. doi:10.4203/ccp.86.177
Keywords: high strength concrete, nonlinear finite element analysis, inelastic buckling, effective buckling length.
Summary
The calculation of the effective buckling length in real concrete columns is not well studied. This is due to most of the performed research studied to obtain such a length are developed assuming a linear elastic material behaviour, which is far away for the case of reinforced concrete. In order to develop simplified models for analysis it is necessary to validate a numerical model which it will be able to recreate as much as possible the columns tested in the laboratory. To do that a bidimensional finite element numerical model in ATENA [1], was calibrated with our experiments. Hereinafter, this virtual laboratory allowed more tests to be performed to propose a new equation for the buckling length.
The buckling length is defined as L_{b}=beta L_{o}, where L_{o} is the real length of the element. If both, the column and the rotational springs are elastic, the buckling length agrees with the classical solution of the differential equation [2]. But if the column is inelastic, lower values of ß (effective buckling length) are observed. Conceptually this makes sense because the real concrete column has a lower stiffness due to cracking (and other effects) than the elastic one, therefore it is as though the rotational springs are more rigid, having a tendency toward the behaviour of the clampedclamped column (which when elastic beta=0.5) . The main problem is that the stiffness of concrete structures is not only dependent on the cracking, but also on the longitudinal reinforcement, the strength of concrete, etc. If a sensitivity study is performed the strength of concrete and the longitudinal reinforcement ratio have the same influence in the inelastic beta coefficient, around 35 and 37%. However the yield stress of steel does not have any influence. If a comparative study is performed between the numerical model and the different codes, it can be shown that there are representative differences with respect to all of them: the ACI code (between 37% and 3%), with the Spanish code EHE (26% and 9.26%), with the Euro code 2 (between the 14% and 14%) and regarding Traver and Bonet (14% and 7%) [3]. It was decided to propose a new equation for the effective buckling length for nonsway column. Three types of equations are proposed for the inelastic effective buckling length: one complete and two simplified (checking and design). It can be noticed that the medium error is 2.6% for checking and around 7.6% for design in the safe side, which it improves greatly the existing methods in the codes. References
purchase the fulltext of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper 
