Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433
CCP: 104
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE
Edited by: J. Pombo
Paper 40

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of the Nose of a High-Speed Train subjected to Cross-Wind Conditions

J. Muñoz-Paniagua, J. García and A. Crespo

Department of Energy and Fluid Mechanics Engineering, Industrial Applied Fluid Mechanics Research Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain

Full Bibliographic Reference for this paper
, "Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of the Nose of a High-Speed Train subjected to Cross-Wind Conditions", in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 40, 2014. doi:10.4203/ccp.104.40
Keywords: shape optimization, high-speed train, genetic algorithm, adjoint method cross-wind.

Summary
Two advanced optimization methods namely genetic algorithms (GAs) and adjoint methods have been used to optimize the nose shape of a high-speed train when it is subjected to cross-wind. In particular, the minimization of the side force at a 90-degree yaw angle cross-wind has been considered. Both methods have been extensively applied in aircraft or vehicle aerodynamic optimization, but are still in progress in train aerodynamics. A comparison of both methods has been performed to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each one while, at the same time, to introduce the methodology for each case. Using a GA requires the necessity of constructing a surrogate model to speed up the optimization process. The information obtained from this metamodel can be used to yield insight into the performance of the design space. In the case of the adjoint method, the information obtained from the sensitivity field permits determining the regions of the geometry where a small modification of the shape might introduce a larger improvement in the train performance, and a good agreement between this information and the successive geometry modifications is observed. The same conclusions have been achieved in both cases, stressing the importance of the A-pillar roundness as the main geometrical parameter to reduce the side force.

purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)

go to the previous paper
go to the next paper
return to the table of contents
return to the book description
purchase this book (price £65 +P&P)